News from The United Kingdom

Discuss world politics in relation to Islam and Muslims.
antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

TTIP is the acronym for the neoliberal Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, proposed US-EU "free trade deal" which the left across Europe opposed vehemently on the correct grounds that it subordinated national democratic lawmaking to globalist corporate diktat. They really do need another name.
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by Ariel »

The picture in this article clearly shows three white people scowling at a black woman in a meadow.

This PROVES that the countryside is racist.

England needs to bulldoze all rural areas and replace them with urban ghettos so that they might be more inclusive for people of colour.

Image
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

Hmmm. Some other articles from this "journalist":

HERE

She describes the diferent men who molested (presumably) her and someone else as "priests".Definitely not a Hindu or Sikh with a name like that. Is she a Christian? I think she is using the word "priest" misleadingly to avoid, as she sees it, reinforcing "negative stereotypes" of Muslim males, although the perpetrators were doubtless Muslim clerics. We don't call Catholic pedophile priests "imams" for godsake!

HERE

Coincidentally the author of THIS ARTICLE places the word 'journalist' in disparaging quotation marks as I have above when referring to Faima Bakar - who tells us that while here is no problem with gangs of Muslim males seeking out white girls to violate, there is a HUGE problem of white racists making the English countryside a no-go zone for people of color.
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

User avatar
Takeiteasynow
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 8:24 pm

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by Takeiteasynow »

Here's a complete list of Fatima's articles, https://muckrack.com/faima-bakar/articles,
including hits like
- Woman, 55, who's spent almost £30,000 on tattoos asked if genitals are inked
- More than 200 take part in naked art exhibition wearing nothing but face masks
- Woman who missed Greggs during lockdown got the logo tattooed on her bum
- 10-day-old kitten who was born with legs back to front needs funds for surgery
- You can get a sexy Tiger King-inspired costume this Halloween

Such an authority
Abraham= H'ammu'rab(b)i, Historical Muhammad=Benjamin of Tiberias. Islam: Syncretic Israelite Yahwishm Deity: nameless, epithets Dsr, El Qutbay, ʼAlâhâ, Allāh. Ka'ba: Kutha => Samaria => Petra=> Makkah. Hijrah 622: Petra => Kerak

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

From link provide by Takeiteasynow where she celebrates women who reject the freedom the west gives them to go outside with their hair uncovered. Does our "journalist" imagine that if an Islamist group ever became powerful enough to enforce Sharia dress code on all UK women these hijabi fashionistas would be loudly championing her own "right to choose"?
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by Ariel »

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/0 ... e of 2019.

More migrants have arrived in the United Kingdom by boat in September than the whole of 2019, according to reports.

Tuesday’s landings of 393 illegal aliens on English shores made September hit a milestone in migrant arrivals that exceeded the whole of last year. So far in 2020, nearly 7,000 third world migrants have illegally crossed the English Channel from France into British territory on small boats. September 2nd saw the highest daily arrivals, with 416 illegals landing.

While reports vary as to whether last year saw 1,800 or 1,823 people arrive, The Telegraph reported on Wednesday that for September 2020 alone there had been at least 1,880, with days still to go before the end of the month. According to government figures, 2018 only saw a combined 297 interceptions in British waters and landings on English beaches.

The Conservative Party government of Boris Johnson has claimed that it is working with the French government to stop the economic migrants leaving France for the United Kingdom. However, the MP for Dover — a migrant landing hotspot — Natalie Elphicke criticised the French for failing to do more.

“The number of illegal entrants breaking into Britain is unacceptable. More action is needed to stop boats leaving French shores in the first place and turn them back to France.

“Safety at sea starts with stopping small boats leaving French shores in the first place. When boats do launch, they must be turned around at the earliest opportunity, closer to land. Only then will we see an end of the small boat crossings,” the Conservative MP said.

French authorities are reportedly blocking only around 20 per cent of boats that leave their shores, despite the British having paid France some £100 million in the past five years to stop the flow.

Mr Farage was the first to report that rather than intercepting and turning boats back, the French authorities were escorting migrant vessels into British territorial water and coordinating with British authorities for their handover.

Last week, Mr Farage watched a new phenomenon, where not only did the French navy shadow a small boat carrying 16 Afghans into British waters, but abandoned it, with no British authorities in sight. Concerned that the craft was overburdened and taking on water in worsening weather, Mr Farage maintained contact with it until a UK Border Force arrived some 40 minutes later.

So great are the numbers landing, that two former military bases have been allocated for housing the illegals, with the first of up to 431 arriving in Folkestone, Kent, this week. The second base in Wales is set to house to some 250.

The Home Office said that on Tuesday, 26 boats had entered British waters, with Mr Farage saying that his sources in Kent said it was much higher. Mr Farage told The Telegraph: “I am deeply suspicious of these numbers.”

He continued: “I have been out in the Channel, seen boats, asked the Home Office for a list of incidents, and that list bore no relation to what I saw. Yesterday, I was told that as many as 54 boats had crossed.”

The Home Office rejected Mr Farage’s claim that it was lying.

The numbers of landings are likely much higher than the government reports, however. Not only does the Home Office refuse to include the numbers of alleged child migrants landing, but an untold number of migrants arrive and disappear without coming into contact with the British authorities, clearly having no intention of claiming asylum.

Mr Farage reported for months testimonial of locals in Kent and East Sussex that many migrants arrive under cover of darkness and remain off of the Home Office’s official immigration books. The Home Office initially denied this, but the mainstream media finally reported earlier this month that it caught migrants landing on Kentish beaches and then “fleeing” to avoid being registered with authorities.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by Ariel »

The first of up to 400 asylum seekers were seen at Napier Barracks in Folkestone on a Monday evening.
The arrivals are understood to be migrants who crossed the Channel aboard small boats.

Image

But they don't like it there.

What good enough is for British soldiers, must be good enough for asylum seekers. Or do they expect to stay forever in a 4 star hotel.
Asylum seekers 'crammed in rooms with 20 sharing two toilets' at run-down barracks

Refugees at Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, claim 20 people are sharing two toilets and two showers, with one calling it 'dangerous with the virus' as 'people are too close'

Asylum seekers housed in a run-down military barracks are being crammed in 20 to a room amid the coronavirus pandemic, it is claimed.

Refugees at Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, say 20 people are sharing two toilets and two showers.

Campaigners said their treatment amounted to “quasi-detention”.

Suley, 19, from Ethiopia, said: “In my room there are two of us and that is OK, but in the next room there are 20 people in there, probably more.”

A Sudanese refugee we are calling Baoo, 30, confirmed the claim, and said: “It is dangerous with the virus, people are too close, and we are told the virus will get worse in the winter.

“If only one person gets infected then lots of us will get infected within a day.”

The Government is now sending arrivals to stay at Napier Barracks and another camp in Pembrokeshire, Wales.

The Home Office said arrivals quarantined for two weeks in hotels before being sent to the barracks while their asylum claims were being processed.

Bella Sankey, director of immigration welfare charity Detention Action, said: “How is 20 people in one room Covid-secure? It feels like quasi-detention. Hotel accommodation is inappropriate for many reasons, but barracks is 10 times worse.

“We have traumatised asylum seekers being kept in a military base.”

Suley and his 23-year-old friend Hussain, also Ethiopian, said they had been in a hotel in London, with individual rooms, for two months before arriving in Kent four days ago.

Standing by the barbed wire fencing, Suley said: “We have no idea why we are here. Do you know what they will do with us?”

Bridget Chapman, from Kent Refugee Action Network, said: “These are old buildings that were earmarked for demolition. I am concerned about the site being fit for purpose and Covid-secure.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Nobody staying at Napier Barracks is being detained.

“Asylum seekers are able to come and go from the accommodation and are staying in safe, Covid-compliant conditions.”

How long takes it before those barracks are burned to the ground? :clueless:
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

Doubtless Bella Sankey and Bridget Chapman have so filled their own homes with "refugees"that they can't accommodate any more!
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by Ariel »

Every town in all countries have sister cities or twin towns. They are a form of legal or social agreement between towns, cities, and counties

Wakefield had a band with Nanning City and Xiangyang. But not anymore, Muslims don't like it. This because of of China's treatment of Uyghur Muslims.
Mosque leaders in Wakefield were among critics of Nanning City and Xiangyang friendships

Wakefield Council abandoned its sister city agreements with Nanning City and Xiangyang this week amid international criticism of China's treatment of Uyghur Muslims.

It's thought that the local authority may be the first in the UK to abandon ties with China over the issue.

The decision was taken after the council started a public consultation and asked specifically for the views of Wakefield's Muslim community.

It followed calls from the district's sole Liberal Democrat councillor, Tom Gordon, for the friendships to be ditched.

The authority's Labour leader, Denise Jeffery, told a full council meeting on Wednesday that she'd been "surprised and pleased" to receive 40 responses from local residents, and also, "A letter from the head of the mosques across the district saying we should cease the friendships".

Asked later if there was any chance of the relationships being rekindled at a later date, Coun Jeffery said: "I can't see that we will be doing anything else in the future to be honest.

"You never know, but this council and many others will not want to sign friendship deals while there is abuse, or alleged abuse, of the Muslim community."

Coun Gordon welcomed the council's decision, but criticised Coun Jeffery for having "put genocide out to consultation".

He said: "There is undeniable evidence of the horrendous treatment of Uyghur Muslims in China.

"This can't be disputed and I don't think any rational or right-minded person would seek to do that.

"We've seen the Chinese ambassador lie down the camera and say there's a good reason for Muslims to be handcuffed, hooded and marched onto trains.

"This has an awful echo if previous genocides that the world has seen and let's be clear that that's what this is - a genocide.

"This is not a party political issue. This is about what's right."

Two Conservative councillors argued against ending the relationships, with the opposition's group leader Nadeem Ahmed suggesting it would be more productive to raise concerns "in the spirit of friendship".

Fellow Tory Samantha Harvey, who helped forge the council's relationship with Nanning City in May last year, was even stronger in her criticism.

She said: "We should not reject these cities based on the circumstances of another region, 4,000km away from them.

"We would be furious if they decided to leave us because of the actions of London, when we were in the midst of forming plans, investments, and connections. This is the same concept.

"Whilst the morality of the council’s decision may be sound, the manner in which they have carried it out has been deeply unprofessional. It seems hasty and reactive, based on less than a handful opinions than genuine humanitarian worries.

"As a Chinese-born councillor, I have been labelled as a mouthpiece for Beijing. This is absurd. Firstly, I have no political power in China. I am a proud Yorkshire woman spent most of my adult life here working and living in the sunny Wakefield."
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by Ariel »

Labour: “Not surprising” that 47% of Tories think Islam is a threat to UK

Labour has said it is “not surprising” that a new HOPE not hate poll shows 47% of Conservative Party members think Islam is a threat to the British way of life given the Prime Minister’s own history of Islamophobic remarks.

Responding to the research today, Labour called on Boris Johnson to “initiate a genuinely independent and transparent investigation” into anti-Muslim racism in his party following accusations that a current inquiry has been watered down.

The research from the anti-racism charity, which was submitted to the Tory inquiry into “all forms of racism including Islamophobia”, also indicated that a majority of party members held negative attitudes towards Muslims.

Commenting on the new findings, shadow faith minister Janet Daby told LabourList: “These are very distressing figures. British Muslims have the right to live without the fear of Islamophobic hate and prejudice.

“This is a question of leadership. Given Boris Johnson’s own disparaging comments about Muslims, it is perhaps not surprising that Islamophobia is so prevalent in his party. To root this out and restore trust, the Prime Minister must initiate a genuinely independent and transparent investigation.”

Johnson has been accused of repeatedly making Islamophobic statements in the past, including arguing that it was a “natural reaction” to be afraid of Muslims, questioning their loyalty after the 7/7 bombings and comparing women who wear burqas to “letterboxes”.

The HOPE not hate poll of over 1,000 Conservative Party members showed that 47% of those consulted thought Islam was a threat to the UK way of life, with only 27% thinking it was compatible with living in Britain.

Of those who felt Muslims were a “threat”, 50% agreed with the statement: “Islam breeds intolerance for free speech and calls for violent actions against those who mock, criticise or depict the religion in ways they believe are offensive.”

41% of members polled believed Muslims did not want to integrate and the same number agreed with the idea that Islam promotes discrimination against, and the physical abuse of, women as well as the grooming of white British girls.

A further 24% thought that the Muslim population was growing at too fast a rate and will supplant white British people, mirroring the ideas of the far-right ‘Great Replacement‘ conspiracy theory.

58% of the Tory members also agreed with the unfounded theory that there are no-go areas of the UK, where Sharia Law dominates and non-Muslims are not allowed to enter.

The data was collected by the charity for their submission to the party’s racism inquiry, alongside examples of 40 Conservative councillors, MPs and activists who have been faced Islamophobia complaints but faced no disciplinary action.

Recent high-profile cases of racism among Tory councillors include one calling Saudi Arabians “sand peasants”, another suggesting Tommy Robinson was a patriot and the Tory mayor of Pendle comparing Asian people to dogs.

During the Conservative leadership election last year, the then candidate Boris Johnson pledged in a BBC debate to implement an independent inquiry into Islamophobia in the Tory Party.

Johnson subsequently downgraded the pledge into a broad-brush review into how the party handles disciplinary complaints on all forms of racism as well as Islamophobia.

The decision led the general secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain Harun Khan to argue that the Conservative Party was following its “customary approach to Islamophobia, that of denial, dismissal and deceit”.

Commenting on the poll, HOPE not hate CEO Nick Lowles said: “The Conservative Party has to face up to the widespread anti-Muslim prejudice in its ranks if it ever hopes to eradicate the problem.

“It’s dispiriting that HOPE not hate has to again call attention to the prejudiced idea held by many within the Tory rank and file that there is a conflict between being Muslim and being British.

“We have also documented further instances of publicly expressed anti-Muslim sentiment from members, activists and councillors, and even MPs. It’s difficult to argue against the many proofs of the problem, the real question is how bold the Conservatives will be in taking action.”

Despite the findings suggesting widespread Islamophobia among Tory members, past research from the charity has found that only 8% of them believed their party had any kind of problem with anti-Muslim racism.

The group chose to take out banner ads on Tory activist news site Conservative Home in July last year to spread awareness of the Islamophobia problem, as well as to criticise the lack of any firm commitment from party leaders to deal with it.

Hate crimes in the UK doubled between 2013 and 2019 according to government figures published last year, including a significant rise in the number of hate crime offences perpetrated against Muslims.
A further 24% thought that the Muslim population was growing at too fast a rate and will supplant white British people, mirroring the ideas of the far-right ‘Great Replacement‘ conspiracy theory.
Conspiracy theory? The city of London has the highest number of Muslims in a single city with over one million followers of Islam residing there.

Conspiracy theory? Savile Town.... There are almost no white residents to be found in Savile Town.

'Go away, you shouldn't be here. Don't come back': The corner of Yorkshire that has almost no white residents
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

The UK Labour Party's ongoing problem with leftist anti-Semitic hostility to the Jews having their own homeland in the ancient homeland of the Jews has led them to try and "level the field" by claiming that the Tories have an "equal" problem with "Islamophobia". See what I just did there? I put the word "Islamophobia" in quotation marks as if I don't take the word seriously. That's because I don't. It's just a word thrown around like confetti to stifle people expressing their reasonable concerns about a religion which, whenever it achieves demographic or political dominance, leads to a dire and precarious existence for those of us who choose not to accept it's premises and precepts. Morever, Hinduphobia and Sikhophobia have not been identified as problems in the UK for the simple fact that members of these Asian groups have not engaged in repeated outbursts of fanatical rage
nor repeatedly committed acts of mass murder nor expressed their desire to bring their western lands of residence under a barbaric dark-age legal code. If the UK Labour Party think the still-majority (despite their best efforts) UK population are just going to disregard these things when considering Islam they are living in cloud cuckoo land. To explain to leftists who regard Zionism as as a dirty word, if any happen to be reading here: The modern Zionist movement came into being because the Jews of Europe , given their history of periodically having the crap kicked out of them across the continent, decided that they needed their own homeland back in the land of their origin as a place of refuge and safety. That dream became a reality when the Muslim Ottoman Empire, whose ghazis and jihadis had in previous centuries massacred and raped their way through Christian Europe before being stopped at Vienna, decided to join the losing side in WWI. Naturally, the victors took political control of the erstwhile Ottoman territories. That's what victors do, as Stalin pointed out. "But why should the Palestinians suffer because the Europeans mistreated it's Jews?" I hear the UK leftist anti-zionists/semites whine. Where on Earth were the Jews going to establish their own state if not where they did so? Cornwall? Antarctica? GERMANY? Furthermore, since you believe in open borders, particularly for Muslims, what is the basis of your retrospective objection to Jews fleeing GENUINE persecution going to live in the middle East? Everybody should be free to settle where on earth they like shouldn't they? The left urgently needs to cure itself of its pathological anti-Semitic hostility to Israel and the Labour Party should seriously address this problem rather than trying to promote a spurious equivalence between a centuries-long phenomenon that culminated in the mass murder of millions of Jews and Boris Johnson mocking women who choose to dress in a manner that proclaims their rejection of everything British women have fought for over the past hundred years.

Responding to the research today, Labour called on Boris Johnson to “initiate a genuinely independent and transparent investigation”

Undertaken by the Muslim Council of Britain no doubt!
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

sum
Posts: 6626
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:11 pm

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by sum »

Why doesn`t the Labour Party want an investigation into why Islam is, or is not acceptable, both to Britain and to non-muslims? Why choose the word "Muslim"? Is the Labour Party hoping to find "racism" and "Islamophobia" in society including the Conservative Party?

This is a very very cheap exercise to gain popularity with muslims. The Labour Party is pandering to the muslims - disgraceful.

Why doesn`t the Labour Party open an investigation into why Jews and Judaism are unpopular with muslums? Could the answer be in the Koran? This would be a far more appropriate investigation.

sum

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

sum wrote:This is a very very cheap exercise to gain popularity with muslims.
That is part of it I am sure, but not all or even most of it. The "left" in the UK and pretty much everywhere else genuinely regards any "negative" commentary on Islam, it's followers or its history, regardless of how pertinent, as being motivated by a racist desire to harm citizens of non-European origin. Those who loudly proclaim that "white silence is violence" would scream "far right" and "racist" if the word "white" was replaced by "Muslim" following a jihad atrocity.
Why doesn`t the Labour Party open an investigation into why Jews and Judaism are unpopular with muslims?
Most UK Labor MPs, and indeed Liberals, would reflexively denounce that very question as an instance of "demonizing Muslims" and, of course, the sort of "Islamophobia" that urgently needs criminalizing. That is how tangled their thinking has become.
Could the answer be in the Koran? This would be a far more appropriate investigation.
Ditto the above.
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

Of those who felt Muslims were a "threat" 50% agreed with the statement "Islam breeds intolerance for free speech and calls for violent actions against those who mock, criticise or depict the religion in ways they believe are offensive"
Now WHY would anybody agree with such a manifestly absurd statement? Muslims carrying signs calling for violent actions against (ie murder of) those who mock, criticise or depict the religion in ways they find offensive perhaps? Muslims TAKING violent actions against those who mock, criticise the religion in ways they find offensive? The fact that self-proclaimed "Islamic" countries like Pakistan invariably have laws mandating the judicial murder of those who mock, criticise or depict the religion in ways they find offensive?

The UK Labour Party is demanding that people should simply disregard these things when judging Islam and presumably focus instead on the fact that the vast majority of Muslims have never held up a sign calling for insulters of Islam and it's prophet to be murdered nor engaged in an act of terrorism in the name of Allah. By the same token then we should view Aum shinrikyo as benign because most of its members have never carried out a Sarin attack in a subway.
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

Aum Shinrikyo is designated as a terrorist organisation in the US and many other countries(BBC)


No distinction being made here then between a "radicalised" minority and and a "vast majority" of "moderates" just living their lives. The entire religion is condemned for the actions of a few. Its entire membership is deemed a potential terror threat.
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

GREAT IDEA

However,

Nick Thomas-Symonds, the shadow home secretary, said: “This ludicrous idea is inhumane, completely impractical and wildly expensive. So it seems entirely plausible this Tory government came up with it."

That's right Mr Double-Barrelled, much better to just let God-knows-who into your country to wander around unmonitored anywhere they want to get up to God-knows-what.

You, and the rest of those who want them so much, volunteer to put them up in your own houses and pay to stock your fridge with their halal food at your own expense.
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

Don't know if anyone has already, in the ensuing months, posted on this DIRE EXAMPLE of the horrendous mental tangle those who see themselves as progressives have got themselves into when it comes to the currently most actively unprogressive religion on the planet.

The MCB, as anyone whose ability to process information hasn't been entirely addled by the "Islamophobia" meme can see, is constantly badgering UK politicians to bring in de facto Sharia blasphemy laws under the guise of of combatting "hate".
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

antineoETC
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by antineoETC »

In his grovelling letter of contrition (I would have happily scourged his back for him if he'd wanted to go that extra mile) Jonathon Bartley refers to "heightened levels of Islamophobia and prejudice". What "prejudice" is this? Imagining that many, even most, Muslims DO actually literally believe in the teachings of the religion they profess to follow? Not automatically assuming that a woman who chooses to cover herself head to toe in black cloth is fully signed up to modern concepts of human rights and religious freedom? Suggesting that a message of unmitigated positivity towards the "enemies of Allah" might not be getting routinely preached from mosque pulpits across the land?
"Prophet Muhammad...bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves" SOURCE: BBC website
"Muhammad is considered to be a perfect model" SOURCE: BBC website

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: News from The United Kingdom

Post by Ariel »

The UK's plan to return dozens of illegal migrants to France ends in shambles after 'leftie lawyers' legal trick results in only one going back

The lawyers waited until the last possible moment to prevent the deportation of migrants back to France

The planned deportation of 30 migrants from Great Britain to France ended on Thursday last week in a fiasco. Only one of them ended up on a plane as lawyers managed to at least delay the deportation of the others at the last minute.

According to sources from the British Home Office, lawyers waited until the last possible moment to prevent the deportation of migrants back to France, which is where they entered the UK via the English Channel. In 18 cases, for example, the lawyers raised the issue of human rights.

The dispatched plane, which flew from an unspecified British airport to France, cost taxpayers about 100,000 pounds (€110,000). Onboard, there was only one passenger, who was originally from Sudan, according to Czech news portal Novinky.cz.

Among the migrants who did not get on the plane were also nationals from Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, and Yemen.

Following the news, the British Daily Mail recalled the words of Home Secretary Priti Patel, who vowed to fix the "broken" asylum system. She is now drawing up new legislation to streamline the asylum process after she says "leftie lawyers" used various legal maneuvers to exploit loopholes in the system.

Lawyers, mostly those who work for activist movements, deliberately try to slow down and disrupt the deportation of illegal migrants back to their countries of origin through such tactics. For five migrants who were supposed to be on the flight, it was the second postponed deportation.

According to the Dublin Regulation, only one EU member state, which in this case is France, should decide on granting the asylum to refugees.

The current legal system in the UK allows lawyers to object at any stage of the case, which often leads to deliberate delays in deportations. Home Secretary Patel has already suggested that filling in objections should be allowed only when the case is opened.

Record numbers of migrants have reached the UK over the last year. Brexit party leader Nigel Farage has documented the British Navy's involvement in transporting illegal migrants to British shores. Due to public outrage, the UK government has put the pressure on France to stop migrants from leaving its territory, but many continue to arrive.

The deportation of illegal migrants, most of whom arrive in the UK by boat, has been made more difficult due to the coronavirus pandemic, which has suspended many processes. Nearly 60,000 people stay in cheap hotels and other asylum accommodations across the UK and about 1,200 of them are awaiting deportation after their asylum requests were rejected.

In the UK, asylum seekers are entitled to 37.75 pounds (€42) a week for food and necessities.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

Post Reply