Elections America.

Discuss world politics in relation to Islam and Muslims.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7768
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Elections America.

Post by Ariel »

Only 7 or 8 months to go before we can say....Bye, bye Barack. Image Please close the door behind you, But....Who will be the next president of the United States. Will it be Hillary Clinton, or will it be Donald Trump. A New York professor knows who is going to win. Donald Trump has a 97.6 percent chance — or better — of taking the White House if he’s the Republican nominee says Professor Helmut Norpoth, of Stony Brook University on Long Island .
Get ready for President Trump, says election whiz who’s scary accurate

A New York professor whose formula has proven accurate in every presidential election but one since 1912 says Donald Trump has a 97.6 percent chance — or better — of taking the White House if he’s the Republican nominee.

Political-science Professor Helmut Norpoth, of Stony Brook University on Long Island, created a statistical model for presidential elections using candidates’ primary results and other data to predict the victors, and he’s making Trump an all-but-sure thing this year.

The prediction wizard told university alumni gathered in Manhattan Monday night that Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary Clinton and a 99 percent chance of stomping Bernie Sanders, according to the school’s newspaper, The Statesman.

“The bottom line is that the primary model, using also the cyclical movement, makes it almost certain that Donald Trump will be the next president if he’s a nominee of the [Republican] party,” Norpoth said at the SUNY Global Center in Midtown.

The professor’s formula measures each candidates’ performance in primaries and caucuses to gauge party unity and voter excitement.

One major assumption is that a party that has held the Oval Office for two consecutive terms is less likely to win another term.

Norpoth applied his model, which he created in 1996, to every presidential election going back to 1912, and it worked for every one — with the exception of 1960, when John F. Kennedy narrowly defeated Richard Nixon.

“When I started out with this kind of display a few months ago, I thought it was sort of a joke,” Norpoth said of his 2016 results.

“Well, I’ll tell you right now, it ain’t a joke anymore.

“You think, ‘This is crazy. How can anything come up with something like that?’ ” Norpoth told the audience.

“But that’s exactly the kind of equation I used to predict Bill Clinton winning in ’96, that I used to predict that George Bush would win in 2004, and, as you remember four years ago, that Obama would win in 2012,” he said.

The probability of a Trump win is “almost ‘take it to the bank,’ ” he said.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

HerbM
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by HerbM »

One can hope. I am not particularly a fan of Trump but 4-8 years of Clinton will probably make America unrecoverable.

If nothing else, the SCOTUS picks coming up will destroy the Constitution.

User avatar
Fernando
Posts: 4949
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by Fernando »

Douglas Murray has this to say in today's Spectator:
Why does the US's new counter-extremism strategy ignore the only salient issue?
The USA has a new CVE (Countering Violent Extremism) strategy. It is a typically curious document. I wonder in fact if the key to it does not lie in the foreword by John Kerry, which is accompanied by a photograph of the Secretary of State looking strangely stoned.

Although in that foreword Secretary Kerry claims that ‘our challenge is dynamic’, he seems to have got that all the wrong way around. Certainly America’s enemies are dynamic. But on the evidence of this document the US government is quite supremely blissed-out.

For instance, readers will be unsurprised to learn that in this 12-page document purporting to deal with one of the great security issues of our time, the word ‘Islam’, let alone ‘Muslim’, does not appear once.
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/05/wh ... ent-issue/
‘Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs and literary traditions. They neither intermarry nor eat together, and indeed they belong to two different civilisations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions.’ Muhammad Ali Jinnah

User avatar
Hombre
Posts: 3741
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:18 am

Re: Elections America.

Post by Hombre »

HerbM wrote:One can hope. I am not particularly a fan of Trump but 4-8 years of Clinton will probably make America unrecoverable.

If nothing else, the SCOTUS picks coming up will destroy the Constitution.
Herb, Obama's choice of next SC justice was previously endorsed by many GOP senators, and he is very respected among conservatives & liberals alike. All I care is not another "fish" like Clearance Thomas, whom for 10 years uttered not q single word in all the public SC hearings, until the NYT started writing about it.
He is a the classic example of "political appointee". The late Anthony Scalia for the conservatives, and Thorgud Marshal (Liberals) were known for their brilliant mind - Not Thomas.

As for Trump, Unlike other previous candidates, he has managed to alienate women, Latino, Muslims and other minorities in US. These minorities make a big chunk of the electoral. I have a hard time believing, with white-only supporters Don win the elections.

Since 2000 election where Democrats had lost the presidency, all because Al Gore refused to "stoop down to GOP level of attacks", these guys have learned their lesson and learned it well. That explains Obama's two victories. Since then, they have been responding with massive power to any and all GOP's attack - Trump is no exception.

Moreover, the Clintons have proven their staying powers, ruthless and ability to strike back. With the type of connections they have, we are in a very hot summer. Trump will not have an easy time with HRC - not withstanding this professor's predictions.

I for one, care less about rhetoric and demagoguery talk - all I care, is experience and ability to lead this country.

idesigner1
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by idesigner1 »

Here Clinton-Obama's blunders are mentioned .

Two terms of Bush-Chenney had devastated US, got USA involve d in unnecessary wars.

How convenient to give them free ride?

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7768
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Elections America.

Post by Ariel »

Muslims, and left-wing tugs dont like Trump, so they want him dead. I, and many other people did not like Obama, but I have never seen that anti Obama protesters asking openly for his death.
Image
Death Threat to Trump at Protest: ‘He’ll Be Dead Within a Week’

Hundreds of protesters gathered outside a Donald Trump rally on Friday, chanting “f**k Donald Trump” and holding obscene signs — including one that included a death threat against Trump should he win the presidency in November.
The young protester held up a sign that read: “If TRUMP wins He’ll be DEAD with in A week The Cartel wont have his Bullsh*t.”

At one point, while music played, the crowd began chanting the Spanish obscenity, “puto,” together with “Donald Trump.”

Still more protesters held signs that read, “Trump eres hijo de puta” and “Coachella contra el puto Trump.”

Mexican flags waved as the crowd flooded the street in front of the San Diego Convention Center, where Trump was speaking.

At one point bottles were thrown at police, and in the course of the protests, several people were detained. Several piñatas depicted Trump, including one whose head had been severed in the street, with the rest just a crumpled bit of papier-mâché.

One protester wearing a Donald Trump wig also wore lipstick and danced around to the rap song “F**k Donald Trump” while holding dollar bills, brandishing his middle fingers, and appearing to occasionally grab his crotch.

For the most part, protesters’ signs did little more than insult Trump over his looks, compare him to Adolf Hitler, and call him as stupid bigoted.

Nearing the end of the rally, three young people came out of the building, announcing that they had been kicked out. One of them identified the group as supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.

Inside the rally, Trump supporters were enthusiastic and positive. Only a few protesters had to be removed from the crowd.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

idesigner1
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by idesigner1 »

Obama received lots of death threats from southern whites and all kind of racists.

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7768
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Elections America.

Post by Ariel »

idesigner1 wrote:Obama received lots of death threats from southern whites and all kind of racists.
Oke...I did not know that, but...Are you a racist when you do not like Obama? :clueless:
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

idesigner1
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by idesigner1 »

I won't belittle a threat against a president of USA, although he is believed to born in Timbktu or glee, gloat or be sarcastic because that president happen to be black.

Number of threats Obama received is well documented.Many were questioned about it. I can tell you with confidence that people who threatened him were never fought for one man one vote or integration or desegregation of school system.

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7768
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Elections America.

Post by Ariel »

Obama Tries to Trash Donald Trump and Turns into a Stuttering Mess

The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

HerbM
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by HerbM »

idesigner1 wrote:I won't belittle a threat against a president of USA, although he is believed to born in Timbktu or glee, gloat or be sarcastic because that president happen to be black.

Number of threats Obama received is well documented.Many were questioned about it. I can tell you with confidence that people who threatened him were never fought for one man one vote or integration or desegregation of school system.
'

This might be one of those myths that everybody 'knows' but that just isn't grounded in reality in a serious way.

Also, every President gets death threats and the Secret Service take them all as completely serious -- as they should.

Do you have any reliable, documented links or evidence that threats against Obama were in any way unusually numerous or otherwise egregious?

Many times these memes and myths get started and pretty soon the entire press corp and others act like they are true. Sometimes these myths have a kernel of truth that is taken out of context or just repeated until it becomes the effective normal view.

I certainly don't recall seeing many (if any) openly expressed like this.

idesigner1
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by idesigner1 »

HerbM wrote:
idesigner1 wrote:I won't belittle a threat against a president of USA, although he is believed to born in Timbktu or glee, gloat or be sarcastic because that president happen to be black.

Number of threats Obama received is well documented.Many were questioned about it. I can tell you with confidence that people who threatened him were never fought for one man one vote or integration or desegregation of school system.
'

This might be one of those myths that everybody 'knows' but that just isn't grounded in reality in a serious way.

Also, every President gets death threats and the Secret Service take them all as completely serious -- as they should.

Do you have any reliable, documented links or evidence that threats against Obama were in any way unusually numerous or otherwise egregious?mm

Many times these memes and myths get started and pretty soon the entire press corp and others act like they are t



Sometimes these myths have a kernel of truth that is taken out of context or just repeated until it becomes the effective normal view.

I certainly don't recall seeing many (if any) openly expressed like this.
Obama received lots of threats once he announced his candidacy in 2012.

I don't have a data which compares with white candidates but some ex white cops, white military kind guys were in forefront.Many dismissed as nuts, how convenient when whites are involved if blacks involved their heads will be blown off!! Lot of data on Internet and do search, examine the background of suspect. There were many attacks carried out on White House. Many psycho guys were caught, many time lax security was blamed but still many questions were unanswered.

User avatar
Fernando
Posts: 4949
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by Fernando »

Saudis funding 20% of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign

JUNE 18, 2016 1:20 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER 2 COMMENTS

The U.S. imam Warith Deen Mohammed said in 1999: “In Saudi Arabia it’s the Wahabi school of thought…and they say, ‘We’re gonna give you our money, then we want you to…prefer our school of thought.’ That’s in there whether they say it or not. So there is a problem receiving gifts that seem to have no attachment, no strings attached.”

“Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.” — Hillary Clinton

“The Clinton Foundation…disclosed in 2008 that it had accepted up to US$25 million from the Saudi Kingdom in the same year. Other foreign governments who have donated money to the Clintons include…Kuwait, Qatar, Brunei, Oman…”

Hillary Clinton is bought and paid for.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/saud ... l-campaign
‘Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs and literary traditions. They neither intermarry nor eat together, and indeed they belong to two different civilisations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions.’ Muhammad Ali Jinnah

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7768
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Elections America.

Post by Ariel »

Huma Abedin, Daughter of Jihad

By Matthew Vadum

Image

Hillary Clinton longtime lieutenant Huma Abedin’s exhaustively documented connections to Islamic terror are receiving renewed attention thanks to a new column written by political gadfly Roger Stone.

Abedin, now vice-chairman of Clinton’s campaign, is the person “closest to the most powerful woman in American politics and perhaps the next President,” Stone writes at Breitbart. “Huma has been described variously as Hillary’s ‘body woman,’ a sort of glorified go-to personal maid, gentle confidant, and by others as an Islamic spy.”

“She may be all of these things,” writes Stone, who is close to GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump.

“Abedin was deeply involved with the establishment of Hillary’s private email server, which was used for all of her work as Secretary of State. Now, since we know Hillary had hundreds of classified or top-secret documents on her vulnerable server (despite her early lies saying she did not), any faith in Huma’s judgment—at the very least—has been demolished. You will soon ask yourself, ‘how did this woman get a security clearance?’”

Abedin’s background, including her suspect ties to Saudi Arabia, was previously examined by FrontPage but sounding the alarm about her connections to the Islamist underworld takes on a heightened urgency now that polls suggest Clinton is dangerously close to assuming the presidency. Abedin has been joined at the hip to Hillary for decades and would probably be a major figure such as policy director or chief of staff in the White House if she wins.

The power this daughter of jihad could—once again—wield over Americans and world affairs is truly frightening. For all we know, Abedin may have played a role in shutting down counter-terrorism measures that could have been useful in preventing Islamist attacks in the U.S. and abroad.

Stone’s report was part rebuttal to a lie-packed column earlier this year from Media Matters for America, the “conservative misinformation” monitoring group Clinton brags about founding. Placed in the unusual position of having to attack its liberal allies in the mainstream media, the MMfA post purported to debunk a relatively mild Vanity Fair profile that examined Abedin’s Islamist ties.

Stone’s report comes in the wake of the jihadist bloodbath perpetrated early Sunday morning by Omar Mir Siddique Mateen at Pulse, a popular gay nightclub in Orlando, Fla. Police said Mateen wielded a semiautomatic Sig Sauer MCX rifle and a Glock 17 handgun to kill 49 innocent victims and wound another 53 in what has been called the worst mass shooting in American history and the worst domestic terrorist attack since 9/11.

It was widely and incorrectly reported by the Second Amendment-hating media that an AR-15 rifle was used, probably because it fits the Left’s predetermined narrative. The Left fetishizes the wildly popular AR-15, portraying it as a monstrous weapon of mass destruction because in 2012 it was used in the mass shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., and the movie theater in Aurora, Colo. It was also used in the mass shootings last year at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore., and in San Bernardino, Calif.

Islamic State claimed responsibility for the weekend attack after it took place. Mateen himself “claimed allegiance to the Islamic State and praised the Boston Marathon bombers,” before being killed by police on the scene, the New York Times reports.

The Orlando attack is the 86th Islamist terror plot in the United States since Sept. 11, 2001, according to the Daily Signal. It is the 20th Islamist attack or plot “aimed at large public gatherings, such as bars and restaurants, shopping malls, parks, and conventions” and the sixth Islamist domestic terror plot or attack in 2016 alone.

FrontPage readers already know the basics about Abedin and her family’s generational ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Born in 1976 in Kalamazoo, Mich., Abedin’s mother is Pakistani-born Saleha Mahmood Abedin, widow of Indian-born Zyed Abedin, an academic who taught at Wahhabist Saudi Arabia’s King Abdulaziz University. Mr. Abedin was affiliated with the Muslim Students Association (MSA) at Western Michigan University. The MSA was founded in the 1960s by the Muslim World League (MWL), Saudi Arabia’s largest charity, which is also a militant organization with links to Osama bin Laden.

In 1978 the Abedins moved to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Islamist Abdullah Omar Naseef hired Mr. Abedin to work at the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), an Islamic think tank. Huma’s parents became members of the editorial board of IMMA’s publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, which Andrew C. McCarthy has said seeks “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.”

Naseef himself is an extremist with ties to al-Qaeda. In 1983 he became secretary-general of the MWL, an organization McCarthy calls “the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.” Huma’s mother became an official representative of MWL in the 1990s. When her husband died in 1994, Mrs. Abedin became the IMMA’s director. She currently serves as editor-in-chief of its journal, identified on its website as “Saleha S. Mahmood.” She is also a founding member of the related group called the Muslim Sisterhood.

When Huma returned to the U.S. and interned in the Clinton White House she was simultaneously a member of the executive board of George Washington University’s MSA. From 1996 to 2008, Abedin was assistant editor at the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. Her brother, Hassan Abedin, and sister, Heba Abedin Khalid, are both editors at the publication.

The MWL has received more than $1.3 billion from the Saudi government since 1962, Stone notes.

Naseef, the MWL, and Pakistan created the Rabita Trust in 1988 which a month after 9/11 was designated as a terrorist front and its assets frozen. The Treasury Department said the trust is run by Wa’el Hamza Jalaidan, who founded al-Qaeda with Osama bin Laden. Jalaidan’s assets are also frozen.

A radical cleric named Abdullah Azzam and his protégé, bin Laden, created an organization called Maktab al-Khidamat or MAK in Pakistan in the 1980s to recruit terrorists and raise money. Azzam subsisted on money from the MWL, Stone writes. MAK founders operated in Peshawar out of the office of the MWL and the Muslim Brotherhood. MWL funded MAK using Saudi money “that would eventually go to jihad against the West,” Stone adds. While bin Laden and Azzam rubbed elbows at the MWL’s office the league’s president was Naseef, benefactor of the Abedin family.

On 9/11, Huma was working for Clinton, then a U.S. senator from New York. As the Twin Towers fell Abedin failed to step forward “to shed light” on Naseef, the MWL, or the Rabita Trust. “Sen. Clinton and Huma Abedin betrayed every New Yorker and every American with their silence,” Stone writes.

He notes that on Sept. 18, 2006, while earning a $28,000 annual salary, Abedin purchased a $649,000 Washington, D.C. apartment. “Where did the money come from?”

Stone adds:

“We’ve caught the greatest spies due to their spending well beyond their salaries. At the least, what to make of someone who has lived for 17 years in Saudi Arabia, with parents who have close, long-standing ties with people connected to terrorist organizations, and then comes to the U.S. and within two years gets a job as the First Lady’s assistant?”
“This isn’t some minor aide,” Stone writes. “Huma Abedin has been at Clinton’s side for decades, and it’s time America got some answers.”

Recall that Clinton served as secretary of state from Jan. 21, 2009 to Feb. 1, 2013, during which she poured gasoline on the Muslim world and lit a match. She failed to support the “green revolution” uprising in Iran in 2009. She engineered the “Arab Spring,” a period of civil unrest, wars, and revolutions in the Arab world that began in late 2010 and was followed by the Arab Winter, a backlash that made Islamism and authoritarianism ascendant in the region. She helped the Muslim Brotherhood overthrow longtime U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak in 2012 to clear the way for their candidate, Mohamed Morsi, to assume the Egyptian presidency.

Hillary helped to oust Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi, a move that plunged Libya into chaos. In that anarchic environment Muslim terrorists attacked a U.S. facility in Benghazi, Libya, on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. Clinton failed to provide proper security and did not send U.S. armed forces to attempt a rescue, leaving four Americans dead. She also lied about the nature of the military-style attack, claiming it arose out of Muslims’ anger at an obscure anti-Islam video.

While Hillary was getting people including U.S. allies like Qaddafi killed, ruining lives, undermining American power, advancing political Islam, and lying to the faces of the Benghazi victims’ families, what exactly was Abedin doing behind the scenes?

Stone is right.

Americans need to know what, if any, role Abedin played in Clinton’s decisions that put Americans in harm’s way, started wars, and caused governments to fall.

The stakes are too high not to know.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

User avatar
Fernando
Posts: 4949
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by Fernando »

The temporarily invisible Theresa May is said to have a high-ranking Muslim advisor in the Home Office, who was behind the banning of Spencer and Geller from the UK. In the unlikely event of May's becoming Prime Minister, that woman could well be in a similar position of power.
‘Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs and literary traditions. They neither intermarry nor eat together, and indeed they belong to two different civilisations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions.’ Muhammad Ali Jinnah

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7768
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Elections America.

Post by Ariel »

Image
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

ronyvo
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:50 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by ronyvo »

When this election campaign started, people asked my opinion That was and still is:
1- I said Hillary will win the WH. My reason is the Devil is working hard and he is winning every where. America neglected our Lord of Lords Jesus Christ for decades.
2- Trump is no politician. That means he does not lie. Wait a minute, every body lies. True, but watch Obama and Hillary they cannot open their evil mouths without lying. I think they would choke if they made a mistake and say the truth.
3- The perfidious mainstream media. Oh, the media. That one is very hard to figure out. Why are they selling out their country? It is extremely obvious by now that ISLAM is our no 1 enemy, who lives amongst us.

At last we got an American patriot who realizes that fact. He talks about it straight on and says what he would do about it. A solution does not need brain, but courage and honesty. He would kick them out of our country, which they greatly despise.
4- Definitely, I will vote for Trump. If the evil succeed in getting him out of the race somehow, if he is out, me too. I cannot be part of ruining this once a great country.

Please, Americans: wake up, do not listen to the satanic mainstream media, Look what Obama is doing to support Hillary. He is frightened. If Trump wins Obama would be scared to death, because that might happen when all his horrible acts he committed against the American people are exposed.

idesigner1
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by idesigner1 »

Trump had right idea about how to fight Islam and how to put US house in order.He had many good ideas, but never explained how total ban on Muslims entry can be executed. Without changing US laws, nothing can be changed.For quite a while I supported Trump on my Facebook page.I had to change my mind after his victory and when he vanquished all his opponents.He was on self destructive path since then. I can give dozen incidents. Latest his talk about rigging process!! Well why to bother? Go home!!

Looks like guy is practically insane and not a great believer in democratic process. His all reactions right from feud with Bush, Cruz, Khan and numerous detractor is pure childish, out of proportion and full of temper tantrums . Looks like money can hide insanity, and Trump is number one example.Even after Ted Cruz was no more in picture , he went after him.All his answers and response start with some tirade against some Preceived insults. Text book example of a paranoid, paranoid, paranoia of high order.Elect a nut case.I don't care!!

Here FFI management trys to detract us from his childish behaviour with Khan.Trump had no need to passa comment about Mrs. Khan, non burkha wearing wife.Whole thing started with that.Khan is committed democrat and like Republicans , Demos also prop their own Golden Family! This a well entrenched tradition of US politics. All take advantage of dead or crippled veteran. There are many who sacrificed in a decade long war.We need to accommodate Muslim Americans like khan, whether they are democrat or republican.If Khan was Jihadi to core , he would not have raised a son who will join US army.Oh yes, many warriors of FFI believe that all conspiracy so that Khan can take advantage of his son's sacrifice and later replace constitution with Sharia. We can't accomplish anything if we suspect all Muslims who want to integrate in US.What for? So that this time an insane, paranoid multi millionaire Republican can become president.Chances are he will prepare for more wars . Paranoids and insecure guy goes to war, give him an excuse!!

He has very thin skin of some one who was badly abused as a child. No one rant and rave who is normal!!His supporters explain it as a superb strategy which worked! I can show numerous examples of despot leaders with same kind of MO.

FFI supported Bush and see what happened. Try to supported white warrior McCain who loved more wars more engagement and more veterans. Obama expanded the war in Libiya. They all forget that best policy is let Muslim dictator rule and we all will be better of.Let them fight among themselves.

No matter how good is leader if he has no commitment or patience with democratic or constitutional processes he can't get elected.

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7768
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Elections America.

Post by Ariel »

idesigner1 wrote:
Here FFI management trys to detract us from his childish behaviour with Khan.Trump had no need to passa comment about Mrs. Khan, non burkha wearing wife.Whole thing started with that.Khan is committed democrat and like Republicans , Demos also prop their own Golden Family! This a well entrenched tradition of US politics. All take advantage of dead or crippled veteran. There are many who sacrificed in a decade long war.We need to accommodate Muslim Americans like khan, whether they are democrat or republican.If Khan was Jihadi to core , he would not have raised a son who will join US army.Oh yes, many warriors of FFI believe that all conspiracy so that Khan can take advantage of his son's sacrifice and later replace constitution with Sharia. We can't accomplish anything if we suspect all Muslims who want to integrate in US.What for? So that this time an insane, paranoid multi millionaire Republican can become president.Chances are he will prepare for more wars . Paranoids and insecure guy goes to war, give him an excuse!!
I can't vote, but if I was allowed to vote I would vote for Trump all the way. And about your Mr Khan? Have you read this?

BTW. Mr Khan was tricked into smearing Donald Trump. He allowed himself to be tricked into it. And the Clinton campaign was all too eager to take advantage of him and his family Khan and use them for their own political purposes.
Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’

Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.

In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.

Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”

As Pakistani minister of law and religious affairs, Brohi helped create hundreds of jihadi incubators called madrassas and restored Sharia punishments, such as amputations for theft and demands that rape victims produce four male witnesses or face adultery charges. He also made insulting the Muslim prophet Muhammad a crime punishable by death. To speed the Islamization of Pakistan, he and Zia issued a law that required judges to consult mullahs on every judicial decision for Sharia compliance.

Khan, who says he immigrated to the U.S. in 1980 to escape Pakistan’s “military rule,” nonetheless spoke admiringly of Brohi in his review of his speech. He praised his remarks even though Brohi advocated for the enforcement of the medieval Sharia punishments, known as “hudood” (singular “hadd”), that were later adopted and carried out with brutal efficiency by the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.

“Divinely ordained punishments have to be inflicted,” Brohi asserted, “and there is very little option for the judge called upon to impose Hadd, if facts and circumstances are established that the Hadd in question has been transgressed, to refuse to impose the punishment.”

Of course, such cruel and unusual Sharia punishments, ranging from stonings and floggings to beheadings, would be a flagrant violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Western society is built on individualism and secularism, concepts enshrined in the Constitution. But Brohi scoffs at them, arguing, “The individual has to be sacrificed. Collectivity has a special sanctity attached to it in Islam.”

Brohi goes on to argue that human rights bestowed by Islam include the right of men to “beat” their wives.

“The best statement of the human rights is also to be found in the address delivered by the prophet [Muhammad] so often described as his last address,” Brohi said, quoting: “ ‘You have rights over your wives and they have rights over you. You have the right that they should not defile your bed and that they should not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows you to put them in separate rooms and to beat them but not with severity.’ ”

In his book review, Khan takes no issue with Brohi’s shocking interpretation of human rights. In fact, he claims Brohi “successfully” explains them and argues his points “convincingly.” (The review, which lists Khan as “director” of an Islamic center in Houston, was published in the Texas International Law Journal.)

“The keynote speech of Dr. A.K. Brohi, former Pakistani minister of legal and religious affairs, is a hallmark in this book,” Khan writes. “It successfully explains the Islamic concepts of ‘right’ and ‘just’ in comparison to their Christian and Judaic counterparts.”

Adds Khan: “Brohi argues convincingly for the establishment of a moral value system before guarantees can be given for any kind of rights. To illustrate the point he notes, ‘There is no such thing as human right in the abstract.’”

In context, Khan concurs that human rights can only be guaranteed through the establishment of Sharia’s moral and legal code.

Khan provides his own advocacy for Sharia law in a separate academic paper titled “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law,” which he also wrote in 1983, while studying in Saudi Arabia.

“The invariable and basic rules of Islamic law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah,” Khan writes. “All other juridical works… must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah.”

He explains that Sharia is derived from the Quran and Sunnah, and that the Quran “is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation.”

Khan then notes that Quranic law includes “constitutional law.”

“Family law is laid down in 70 injunctions; civil law in another 70; penal law in 30; jurisdiction and procedure in 13; constitutional law in 10; international relations in 25; and economic and financial order in 10,” he said.

Khan defers to an early Islamic jurist who ruled: “For every issue concerning a Muslim, either there is a binding text (of the Shariah) that rules it, or there is a guidance that may indicate the way to truth. If there is a text, then the Muslim has to follow it.”

A devout Muslim, Khan also cites two notorious Muslim Brotherhood radicals as scholarly sources — Muhammad Hamidullah and Said Ramadan, whom he “gratefully acknowledged.”

Though described by the Clinton camp and media as a “Pakistani-American lawyer,” less known is Khan’s an acknowledged expert on Sharia law doctrine. His 13-page article, which was published in the Houston Journal of International Law, has been cited in dozens of Islamic law articles and has been used in college syllabi for Islamic law courses as recently as 2013.

By comparison, his expertise in American constitutional law is barely evident. In fact, there appears to be few if any legal citations in federal or state court records for Khan, who describes himself on his business website (removed Tuesday from the Internet) as “attorney at law.”

Even so, Khan questioned Trump’s understanding of the Constitution, calling him “ignorant” and suggesting that if he had studied it he would never propose imposing a temporary ban on Muslim immigration to protect the nation from ISIS and other terrorist infiltrators.

“Let me ask you: have you even read the United States Constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy,” a visibly angry Khan bellowed, while waving a pamphlet version in the air.

It’s not immediately clear if Khan has ever repudiated his earlier support for the anti-Constitutional principles of Sharia law. Searches turn up no subsequent writings or statements to that effect. Attempts to reach Khan by phone and email were unsuccessful.

For now, the most patriotic Muslim in America, according to media myth-making, remains Khizr Muazzam Khan, the father of a fallen American soldier who claims to hold the Constitution so dear he keeps a copy in his breast pocket.

But what does he really believe? His Islamist writings offer a window into his ideological thinking — and the view is a contradictory and highly disturbing one, especially in light of the fanfare he has received.

Paul Sperry is a former Hoover Institution media fellow and author of Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

User avatar
Fernando
Posts: 4949
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: Elections America.

Post by Fernando »

Khan is also said to be in business facilitating immigration, and if Trump were to succeed in imposing some sort of moratorium, his business would be down the Swanee.
‘Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs and literary traditions. They neither intermarry nor eat together, and indeed they belong to two different civilisations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions.’ Muhammad Ali Jinnah

Post Reply